CLA 45 AMG v Lancer Evo X MR v Subaru WRX STI

CLA 45 AMG v Lancer Evo X MR v Subaru WRX STI

CLA 45 AMG v Lancer Evo X MR v Subaru WRX STI

by October 6, 2015

Uncork Mercedes-Benz’s CLA 45 AMG and it takes 30 seconds to suspect and an hour to confirm that Germany has stolen what was, just a few years ago, exclusively Japan’s – the giant-killing, all-wheel turbo four-banger crown.

This story was originally published in our December 2013 issue

That first thirty seconds makes a big impact, time enough to climb into the sumptuous leather-dipped cabin, strap yourself into the superb pews, fire up the most potent 2.0-litre turbo four now in volume production, engage ‘S’ sport mode and punch through the first three or four ratios of the slick seven-speed twin-clutch, each upshift met with a bold, rev-matching ‘BRAP’.

But it’s not simply the off-the-line acceleration that, not long ago, only a Japanese small four- or five-door could deliver. It’s an entire cocktail of premium luxury, richness, detail, quality and Germanic precision cocooning its ballistic potental that strongly suggests the game, and its rules, have changed.

CLA 45 AMG v Lancer Evo X drivingThe remaining 59min 30sec is ample enough time to dispel any doubt that Benz’s hyperactive four-door coupe is as quick and dynamically capable as the latest iterations of Mitsubishi’s Evolution and Subaru’s WRX STI, two protagonists whose spiralling, tit-for-tat rivalry had constantly rewritten the four-pot, all-wheel-driven rulebook for giant-killing since the late ’80s.

Two cars that are so often forgiven for their shortcomings in all-roundedness – despite the handsome price tags – because they trade so hard on their impressive bang factor.

The Germans were always going to create hyper all-wheel small cars. It wasn’t a case of if, but when. VW’s Golf R signalled intent, but lacks the Japanese cars’ sheer potency. Audi launched its RS3, BMW its (turbo-six-powered) M135 x-drive, but neither made it to Oz. The CLA 45 AMG, and mechanical twin A45 five-door hatchback, are Australia’s fresh taste of where the game has moved to.

CLA 45 AMG v wheel -spinNot only has Japan left the door wide open for Germany, Asia’s done little to keep both the segment vital and punters interested in recent years. Last decade, you could expect a newer, faster, fitter Evo or STI halo car every 18 to 24 months.

That is until 2008 arrived. Neither of the current Evo and STI breeds have changed or been improved measurably in six years, a strong signal that Mitsubishi and Subaru have dropped the ball by sitting on their hands and resting on their laurels.

Blame the abandonment on the GFC or spiralling pressures with tougher fuel economy and emission targets but, frankly, the Germans are in the same evolutionary boat, and the Deutsch car makers could well have hoisted the standards for small rocket ship excellence beyond Japan’s reach.

Or have they? Sure, fanboys and fangirls might be irked that prices for the ageing rally-bred Evo and STI haven’t dropped much since 2008. A self-shifting, six-speed twin-clutch Evo wants for $61,990, our bells and whistles MR version asking for an extra $4K.

CLA45 AMG v Lancer Evo X MR v Subaru WRX STI 1Meanwhile, our conventional six-speed manual STI sedan wants for $59,990, the same price as the five-speed automatic version we nickname ‘STI-lite’ as it lacks the proper, rally-bred drivetrain hardware of a true (manual) STI. The full-fruit R-Spec sedan, though, wants for $65,990.

But while the Japanese cars haven’t become more savage in the current generation, they’re certainly no less potent than ever. And the CLA 45 AMG asks for a hefty premium, at $86,900. At a whole third of price more than Japan’s entry point, yes, it had want to be much nicer. And, perhaps, much quicker, too. But is it? We’re here to find out.

The Evo inline 2.0-litre offers 217kW at 6500rpm and 366Nm at 3500rpm, while the STI’s larger-bore, shorter-stroke 2.5-litre flat four makes 221kW lower, at 6000rpm, but its superior 407Nm higher in the rev range, at 4000rpm. The AMG favours a long-stroke design of just two litres, yet creates benchmarking outputs of 265kW at 6000rpm and a humongous 450Nm from just 2250rpm upwards.

More telling is power-to-weight. The twin-clutch Evo sedan tips the scales at 1625kg, thus offering 133.5kW per tonne. Meanwhile, the conventional manual STI sedan saves 110kg of kerb weight, its higher power figure conspiring to a healthier 145.8kW per tonne.

At 1510kg, the AMG undercuts the Japanese cars on the weigh bridge, and thanks to an astonishing specific output it makes for a monstrous 175kW per tonne.

Cla v wrx v evo drivingSo far, so academic. But in the march to 100km/h from a standstill there’s less in it between the Japanese cars than you might expect. Both will hit triple figures in just over 5.5 seconds, the Evo without much fuss or fanfare in lieu of the lightning quick upshifts of S-Sport mode in the TC-SST twin-clutcher, the STI requiring more brutality, wing and prayer with its older-school conventional gearbox.

The Evo feels shorter geared, too, allowing the 2.0-litre to find and maintain the sweet spot band between peak torque and power more easily.

There’s certainly difference in engine character too. The Evo has little lag, excellent response and strident low-to-mid-range shove, but it feels to run out of top end. The Subaru’s boxer is most explosive between 4000rpm and cut-out, yet lacks the linearity and throttle control of the Mitsubishi.

The AMG absolutely scorches to the 100km/h mark in just 4.6 seconds –
a full second quicker than the Japanese cars. Some of the benefit comes from its launch control. Some of it the superior torque clocking in a more accessible low-rpm point. But you sense that all of the electronic and mechanical engineering charged with acceleration is operating in unison with absolute, finely tuned precision.

CLA 45 AMG blockSurprisingly, the engine doesn’t feel as manic and ferocious as any of the numbers attached to the AMG suggest – perhaps it’s because it’s so linear, and it plies so much of its peak energy so broadly across the tacho needle sweep.

While we’re at, yes, there is self-shifting STI, but the transmission is a slush-box auto of only five speeds, the engine is detuned to 350Nm and, crucially, the spec omits much of the rally-bred drivetrain trickery – most notably the motorsport-grade differentials front, middle and rear – to qualify it as a ‘real’ STI in any traditional and technical sense. As mentioned, it’s STI-lite. 

After all, an Evo’s or STI’s rally-bred drivetrain – the tricky diffs and torque shuffling smarts that make up the former’s Super All Wheel Control and the latter’s Driver Control Centre Differential systems – not only imbue heroic on-limit dynamics. It’s their soul. It’s the main reason why you stump up for the premium over just a Ralliart- or WRX-spec stable mate.

Lancer Evo X engineThing is, these clever and complex all-wheel-drive systems have subtle, almost nuanced interaction when smothered by the grip of fat tyres on public tarmac, where only anti-social speed and dynamic tomfoolery will reveal dramatic intervention. So, first, we found some dirt road to allow the talents of these systems to shine clear in altogether safer (aka slower) light.

Merc-Benz will claim that off-road plays no part in the CLA 45 AMG equation. Fine. But as we discovered, the four-door coupe’s 4Matic all-wheel drive is more than a hand companion should broken surfaces arise. That said, it’s a natural understeerer with a front-drive bias.

CLA 45 AMG v drivingAnd even if you stick the boot in a mid-gravel corner, only half of the torque will make its way to the rear axle, which features an electrohydraulic multi-clutch differential. Instead, it’s the ESP’s tricky Curve Dynamic Assist intervention, selectively braking the inside wheels, that plays the biggest part in getting the AMG turned through the corner.

The STI is more interactive to the driver and responsive to throttle input, its Driver Control Center Differential system allows manual front-rear torque bias adjustment or automatic distribution of your choice.

The thing is, the STI isn’t terribly agile on corner entry, a bit prone to understeer, and only really comes alive once a fair whack of torque is fired through to the front axle under moderate to heavy throttle application, at which point it lunges wherever the front wheels are pointed.

Subaru WRX STI wheel spinIn essence it’s a point-and-squirt dirt weapon – just make sure you’ve got the pointing bit well sorted before squirting.

The Evo is more balanced, has more front-end bite, has less abrupt torque shuffling going on underneath and is, thus, more fun and satisfying to hustle across gravel or dirt. The Super All-Wheel Control package is a complex and clever system, but the positive upshot is that regardless of whether you set the Active Centre Differential to Tarmac, Gravel or Snow modes, the Evo remains incredibly controllable, adjustable and sure-footed.

Of the three, it offers the highest levels of directness and poise from the instant you initiate a slide. Out of the showroom box, few other road cars can touch Mitsubishi’s hero car for off-road, WRC-wannabe fun factor.

Lancer Evo X wheel spinNot surprisingly, all three cars’ innate, natural characters transfer to the hot-mix quite faithfully. Nor is it surprising that the AMG really comes into its own where nature – and Affalterbach – intended.

The CLA’s steering is beautiful – it’s noticeably lighter in weight than either Japanese car, and not particularly short-ratioed in its rack, yet the clarity through the wheel and linearity lock-to-lock is excellent. The Evo, while not quite the pure, mechanical communicator many of its forebears are, still faithfully connects the driver to the road with satisfying, rippling detail. The STI, however, suffers slightly from dullness and numbness through the wheel. And despite both Japanese cars running identical 245mm-wide 18-inch Dunlop rubber, the Subaru feels a bit more ponderous in its front end, with a little more reluctance to turn in to the corner.

In the mid-corner, the STI grips up beautifully, but it doesn’t sit as flat as its rivals and, despite the favourable weight advantage, feels like the heaviest and slowest to react to driver inputs.

It’s just not as keen and playful as you hoped, requiring a decent manhandling to adjust its line. Get aggressive with the throttle and it pitches torque, and weight, fore and aft with gusto, but there’s not a lot of subtlety. Rapid progress, then, is less about dynamic dexterity and driver interaction, and more about leveraging all that grip and horsepower. In that sense alone, it’s perhaps the least satisfying of the three to punt hard.

Lancer Evo X drivingThe AMG, meanwhile, is more planted than playful, a confident and quite neutral handler that’ll tend to slight, oh-so-safe understeer if going gets a little too hot. Mid corner, its on-limit balance is beautiful, its feedback to the driver all encompassing. It has, in a nutshell, a ‘tidy’ character – no histrionics, yet full of fizzy vibe and feedback.

It’s surefooted and satisfying, and incredibly quick. But, almost surprisingly, not quick enough to dust the Evo on a long stretch of twisty, challenging back country roads.

Yep, that surprised us, too. But where the AMG, with its narrower 235mm 19s, finds its cornering limits and has nowhere to go, the grippier and slightly more agile Evo compensates for its lack of power and excess weight with dynamic talent and an all-wheel-drive system paying real, tangible dividends.

It’s just a little more agile and adjustable, dancing around on its tyres more, for sure, but adjusting its line more eagerly and diving into and out of corners more flamboyantly than the AMG can. Both brilliant, both very different from one another to drive, yet, ultimately, while the AMG is fast, on a twisty country road, the Evo keeps up. They’re dead even for pace.

CLA 45 AMG interiorAs for the rest of the packages, they couldn’t be more different. Inside the ‘45’, precious little of the basic CLA-Class trim work remains, the cabin awash with typically bespoke AMG trimmings – those brilliant seats, lovely leather/Alcantara wheel with magnesium shift paddles, bona-fide premium Merc-Benz fit, finish and materials throughout.

The Japanese pair, though, portray their lower-rent roots and increasingly older-hat relevance all too conspicuously – their leathers feel plasticky, their plastics feel cheap and there’s not much in the way of celebration or premium ambience. That said, again the Evo trumps the STI, notably in sat-nav design, ergonomics and a richer air, such as the better judged use of metallic trim finishes.

Subaru WRX STI interiorAlso, in terms of overall refinement, the Japanese cars have no answer for the German machine. That said, one surprise is how firmly the AMG rides. It’s not terrible by any stretch, but it can be quite jiggly over high frequency bumps and almost nearly as abrupt as the Evo’s.

Other AMG quibbles? Although the twin-clutch transmission will hold ratios on upshifts – bouncing the engine off its rev-limiter if you feel so inclined – it’s not absolutely obedient when it comes to downshifts. And, like so many German cars today, the default shift program is a touch too lazy and its Sport mode a little too aggressive for everyday use.

An all-round superior tool? A proper giant-killing all-wheel turbo-four banger? A game-changer and new benchmark for all to aim at? Yes, yes and yes. That is discounting the CLA’s five-door twin-under-the-skin, A 45 AMG, which is just as quick, adds a touch more visceral intent in the curves, and wants for $12K less.

Cla v wrx v evo cliffEither baby AMG comes with, at the time of writing, a hefty wait of many months. Meanwhile, over in the local Japanese importers’ showroom…

      Mercedes-BENZ CLA 45 AMG     SUBARU WRX STI      Mitsubishi Lancer EVOLUTION X MR
Body     4-door, 5-seat sedan      4-door, 5-seat sedan     4-door, 5-seat sedan
Drive     all-wheel       all-wheel       all-wheel  
Engine     1991cc inline-4, DOHC, 24v     2457cc flat-4, DOHC, 24v     1998cc inline-4, DOHC, 24v
Bore/Stroke     83.0 x 92.0mm     89.0 x 72.5mm      86.0 x 86.0mm
Compression     8.6:1     8.2:1        9.0:1  
Power     265kW @ 6000rpm       221kW @ 6000rpm     217kW @ 6500rpm
Torque     450Nm @ 2250-5000rpm     407Nm @ 4000rpm     366Nm @ 3500rpm
Power-to-weight     175kW/tonne     146kW/tonne     133kW/tonne 
0-100km/h     4.6sec (claimed)     4.9sec (claimed)     5.3sec (previously tested)
Top Speed     250km/h (claimed)     255km/h (claimed)      242km/h (claimed) 
Fuel consumption     6.9L/100km (claimed)     10.5L/100km (claimed)     10.1L/100km (claimed)
Emissions     161g/km CO2 (claimed)     243g/km CO2 (claimed)      256g/km CO2 (claimed)
Transmission     7-speed dual-clutch      6-speed manual     6-speed dual-clutch 
Kerb Weight     1510kg     1515kg     1625kg 
Suspension     struts, A-arms, coil springs, anti-roll bar (f); multi links, coil springs, anti-roll bar (r)     struts, coil springs, anti-roll bar (f); A-arms, coil springs, anti-roll bar(r)     struts, coil-springs, anti-roll bars (f); multi links, coil springs, anti-roll bars (r) 
L/W/H     4691/1777/1416mm     4580/1795/1470mm      4510/1810/1480mm 
Wheelbase     2699mm        2625mm     2650mm 
Tracks     (f/r) 1553/1552mm      (f/r) 1530/1540mm     (f/r) 1545/1545mm 
Steering     electric rack-and-pinion      power rack-and-pinion       power rack-and-pinion 
Brakes     350mm ventilated/drilled/slotted discs, four-piston calipers (f); 330mm ventilated/drilled discs, single-calipers (r)       326mm ventilated discs, four-piston calipers (f); 316mm ventilated discs, two-piston calipers (r)       350mm two-piece ventilated discs, four-piston calipers (f); 330mm ventilated discs, two-piston calipers (r)  
Wheels     18 x 8.0-inch (f/r), alloy     18 x 8.5-inch (f/r), alloy     18 x 8.5-inch (f/r), alloy 
Tyres     Dunlop SP 235/35 ZR18 95XL (f/r)     Dunlop SportMaxx 600 245/40 R18 93W (f/r)     Dunlop SportMaxx 600 245/40 R18 93Y (f/r) 
Price     $86,990     $59,990      $65,990
Positives     Game-changing blend of dynamics, pace and luxury, bad-ass exhaust note     Engine’s top-end whack, rumbling exhaust note, point-and-shoot ability     Fool-proof handling, responsive engine, dynamic weapon of destruction
Negatives     Can’t shake the Evo, disobedient transmission, A 45 AMG is better value     Doughy front-end, blunt tool in this company; MY15 STI ’round the corner     Engine sounds industrial, still looks like a ‘Lancer’, she’s getting heavy
      4.5/5     3.5/5     4/5